Age assurance maturity assessment for gaming platforms
See where your age assurance program stands. Complete the self-assessment to evaluate your verification methods, risk controls and program maturity across the player journey, and get a clear read on where to focus next.
Gaming platforms have to manage age assurance across multiple touchpoints at once. Chat, multiplayer features and in-app purchases all create moments where knowing a user's age matters, and self-declaration is often insufficient by regulator standards.
At the same time, circumvention tactics are getting more sophisticated — from VPN-based workarounds to AI-generated documents — putting pressure on existing verification methods.
This self-assessment gives you a benchmark for your program today and a practical path for strengthening it, whether that means building foundational controls, closing gaps in coverage or refining a program that's already strong.
This resource includes:
- A 12-question self-assessment covering verification methods, risk controls, staffing and regulatory readiness
- Scoring and benchmarking across four maturity tiers: Ad hoc, Developing, Established and Optimized
- A breakdown of what each tier means for your program, including common challenges and recommended next steps
Three reasons to complete the self-assessment
- 1
Protect player trust and loyalty
Age assurance failures damage the trust that keeps players coming back. Knowing where your program stands helps you protect that relationship before it's tested.
- 2
Balance compliance with player experience
Verification is coming, one way or another. The real question is whether your approach adds unnecessary friction for legitimate players or fits smoothly into their experience.
- 3
Turn results into a roadmap
A benchmarked result shows you exactly where your program is strong and where it needs work, giving you a clearer starting point for building your strategy.
“Age assurance is a live discipline, not a compliance box you check once and move on from. The risks shift, the regulations shift and the technology shifts, so the strongest programs are the ones that keep testing themselves against that movement. Nothing in this space ever truly stays finished.”
